(28-10-2013, 03:54)LillyCs Wrote: Hey there, sorry to jack your thread, I think your girls are lovely btw. Very centered compared to mine.. I'd love to have 'em!
Timarie I had a question for you, I have looked online and can't seem to find a good photo example of underdeveloped breasts that aren't tuberous. I noticed you said it's mostly about the nipple. You can't see my nipple unless I am cold. They just blend into my areola. No sticking out at all. Is this a sign of underdevoped? I wonder because it seems my growth stunted when I was younger. I started smoking at 15 and was always underweight until this year. I'm 23 now. Any advice? I would like to know because PM hasn't done anything for me after a very strict 3 months I I'm wondering if BO would work better.
Thanks and sorry again for the thread jacking!
Happy growing
Honestly it's more about the areola in relation to the surface of the breast than it is about the actual nipple. Sorry I was vague about that! I've attached an illustration and a set of photographs below if it helps. For a Tanner IV Stage, you can see that the areola makes a cone-shape up off of the surface area of the breast. With a fully developed breast, the areola is flush with the surface of the breast and is not puffy like the areola of the Tanner IV stage breast. As for your nipple blending into your areola, that would just be one characteristic that makes us all different from one another like noses and eyes. I really don't think the actual nipple itself represents anything of the maturity stage. From what I understand, it is mostly about the areola.
As for whether or not your program is working for you, 3 months is when you should start to see changes, not give up if you haven't seen anything yet. So, if I were you, I'd give it at least a good 6 months before throwing in the towel with that program.