28-04-2013, 19:17
I stumbled upon Triactol while researching Pueraria mirifica and simply the google results for it set all my alarm bells ringing. It seemed impossible to find a genuine review. Sure, there were lots of "My triactol experience" blogs with glowing praise but they were all so obviously fake it hurt. Triactol also seem to be experts in covering up negative reviews and creating fake profiles on pages like this.
Results in 7 days? BS. That is not how the human body works. Clinical study? One of the trials was done internally, as in, by the producing company itself and the sample size was 16 women, which is not statistically robust. The trials were neither placebo-controlled nor double-blind and there is NO evidence of these trials being registered anywhere official (which real clinical trials are). If any real person has actually had success with it, I'm glad for them, but I sure as hell will stay far away from it.
(Sorry to dig up this old thread but I just felt I had to say something about this foul Triactol business)
Results in 7 days? BS. That is not how the human body works. Clinical study? One of the trials was done internally, as in, by the producing company itself and the sample size was 16 women, which is not statistically robust. The trials were neither placebo-controlled nor double-blind and there is NO evidence of these trials being registered anywhere official (which real clinical trials are). If any real person has actually had success with it, I'm glad for them, but I sure as hell will stay far away from it.
(Sorry to dig up this old thread but I just felt I had to say something about this foul Triactol business)