[mochaccino]

Babakins, Thank you for warning me, although I'm not so sure that everything is what it seems. Skincaretalk exists to promote certain companies that they are paid to promote, and they are NOT transparent about it at all. I'm well aware that Fawnie was banned from the forum at one point, but so was every other seller that was not paying to advertise their product on SCT. SCT later came begging on their hands and knees for these sellers to return after it became clear that SCT was not getting as much traffic without them. Most, if not all of them, did rejoin the forum. As far as I can tell, the original banning had nothing to do with "protecting" members, which is why SCT had no problem with allowing them to come back. Maybe Fawnie was an exception who really deserved it, but I think you can see why I can't just trust that SCT banned her for good reasons.

I don't really mind that she doesn't have a license to trade (assuming that's still the case), but of course I do mind if her products don't contain what she says they contain. I wonder who said that her products contain ingredients that are not disclosed? How do they know? Did they actually pay to have it tested in a lab? Of course, I have lots of other questions too. What "fake" PMs? What nastiness? I really do wanna know, and I will be PMing you for details if that's ok. We already totally hijacked Dolls thread and it's all my fault. I'm glad you brought this up, because it's probably about time I looked into it more deeply. I admit I'm biased in favor of Fawnie, but only because I don't trust SCT further than I can spit.

So sorry for the hijacking Doll I'm going away now