16-10-2012, 16:32
(This post was last modified: 16-10-2012, 16:55 by NotSoBusty.)
(15-10-2012, 21:26)mochaccino Wrote: Thanks Mel. I asked Ms.G and Ms.D if they had retained their growth since they were last here, and if they've taken any breaks from BC during that time, but they never responded. There's only one other person that I'm aware of who used PM, BC, and l-arginine for an extended period of time, and that's Notsobusty. She grew, but for some reason her growth just was no where near as fast as Ms.D and Ms.G.
I think rate of growth is pretty subjective and relative to a lot of factors. For example, my growth has always been slow. I think it may have to do with my genetics (Family of all A's and B's). Both Ms. G and D started with significantly more breast tissue than I have, so it could be another prime example of smaller breasts taking longer to respond and the rich (in breast tissue!) getting richer. I also think (*note: not to be taken as scientific) that we all may have a natural growth rate that we cannot surpass. For example, if you grew quickly at first during puberty, then abruptly stopped growing for a number of reasons versus growing gradually and slowly over a few years. Unfortunately for me, mine has always been and always will be slow.

That could be an explanation for why they grew so rapidly and I am still here chugging along, slowly but surely!

Regardless, I think the L-arginine boom and phase has no credibility. I think it is probably more important to keep a balanced diet that is not supplemented heavily with only one product (like a boat-load of l-arginine). It may have been more of a coincidence in their cases, because both of those fine ladies had larger breasts to begin with and the l-arginine could have had zero effect for all we know. AHHH NBE is such a mystery sometimes....