12-08-2011, 07:59
There is probably a fundamental difference between the responses of genetic males and females to PM ( and other phyto-hormones).
Having said that, PM does work on males and produces growth of new underlying breast tissue which can be felt as well as seen. Since the biggest proportion of any breast is fat, the visible breast is significantly larger than the underlying 'real' tissue lump. I know from personal experience that stopping PM for as little as 2 weeks cause loss of the fat and hence visible volume, but there was no perceptible change in the underlying tissue size. A month or so after re-starting PM, the fat was back and things started to move forward again.
It is accepted amongst male PM takers that having reached your goal, whatever size that is, then a permanent low maintenance dose will be required because we have no natural source of estrogen.
However for a GG, it may be different, depending on age of course. If PM spurs your body into producing more underlying tissue, that should be permanent and then your own natural estrogen production, may be enough to maintain the fat content and hence the volume. However everyone is different so there are no guarantees of anything, and that may be why the website you quoted, warns that results may not be permanent.
I do think the 3 months growth limit is a bit wrong though, I'm still growing nicely after 9 months and Chrissie is still growing after about 2 years.
Pansy Mae
Having said that, PM does work on males and produces growth of new underlying breast tissue which can be felt as well as seen. Since the biggest proportion of any breast is fat, the visible breast is significantly larger than the underlying 'real' tissue lump. I know from personal experience that stopping PM for as little as 2 weeks cause loss of the fat and hence visible volume, but there was no perceptible change in the underlying tissue size. A month or so after re-starting PM, the fat was back and things started to move forward again.
It is accepted amongst male PM takers that having reached your goal, whatever size that is, then a permanent low maintenance dose will be required because we have no natural source of estrogen.
However for a GG, it may be different, depending on age of course. If PM spurs your body into producing more underlying tissue, that should be permanent and then your own natural estrogen production, may be enough to maintain the fat content and hence the volume. However everyone is different so there are no guarantees of anything, and that may be why the website you quoted, warns that results may not be permanent.
I do think the 3 months growth limit is a bit wrong though, I'm still growing nicely after 9 months and Chrissie is still growing after about 2 years.
Pansy Mae