Well Bibi,
Your professors have employed an ad hominem argument. For those that don't know, an adhominem argument is an argument based on the characteristics (whether they actually exist or not) of an opponent rather than an appeal to the facts.
Where my harsh opinions come from is irrelevant. I don't see where you disagreed with anything in particular. I really can't see how the origin of my opinions invalidates them. You may notice that I had more support than my opinion.
Do you think, or have you been taught, that opinions that have a background in religion are invalid?
Your professors have employed an ad hominem argument. For those that don't know, an adhominem argument is an argument based on the characteristics (whether they actually exist or not) of an opponent rather than an appeal to the facts.
Where my harsh opinions come from is irrelevant. I don't see where you disagreed with anything in particular. I really can't see how the origin of my opinions invalidates them. You may notice that I had more support than my opinion.
Do you think, or have you been taught, that opinions that have a background in religion are invalid?