[roseability86]

In the light of recent events, I started thinking about something. Is there a difference in men and women growing breasts? If yes, how much difference? Men have all the structures of a real breast but it is not developed. Every embryo develops as a female and at some point the male chromosome becomes active and starts producing male sexual characterisitcs for men. One of the byproducts of this is breasts. Breasts and nipples are formed before Y chromosome activation.

Exactly!! That is what I was thinking the whole time that ridiculous argument about their breasts being different was brought up. I don't know, I'm not a doctor, but I'm sure Cheryl can shed some light. Her breasts look every bit natural and female. Based on the above facts, I'd have to say that it is of my opinion that given Cheryl's low testosterone and the fact she took mammary female hormones, her breasts are probably every bit as booby-like as any female's. I can't see any difference tbh, it's all down to hormones at the end of the day. O and I hope she doesn't mind me sharing, but when I was worried I had started lactating she said she had and described the symptoms. I hadn't, thankfully. But yes, if her breasts can produce milk in a full blown lactation, and that is what nature intended breasts for, then I would have to side with the view that she grew fully fledged breasts as a biological male. It's quite amazing, it really is.

Cheryl, if you read this, you're a treasure and I'm glad we have you on this board. You give hope and inspiration to all of us non-judgemental majority. Your growth is phenomenal. And hell, if BO (hehe that always makes me giggle) and NB can give a biological male bonafide breasts, then why the hell shouldn't it work for us biological ladies?